<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Nearing External Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-3/#comment-110660</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Nearing External Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-110660</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft I would expect to see it leaked. As always, we&#8217;ll keep an eye out for it.I have written previously about why Microsoft needs to deliver a service pack for Windows 7.#dd_ajax_float{background:none [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft I would expect to see it leaked. As always, we&#8217;ll keep an eye out for it.I have written previously about why Microsoft needs to deliver a service pack for Windows 7.#dd_ajax_float{background:none [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Wardingham1</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-79223</link>
		<dc:creator>A Wardingham1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-79223</guid>
		<description>How about a fix for the default file auto arrange setting on the file system, loved XP,s drag and drop, well what can you say about 7,s. how did they miss that one in beta testing?  Google switch off auto arrange files and see how many people are looking to do that. Lots. Someone at MS should google  windows seven faults and then decide what needs to be in a service pack not what one or two geeks whine to them about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a fix for the default file auto arrange setting on the file system, loved XP,s drag and drop, well what can you say about 7,s. how did they miss that one in beta testing?  Google switch off auto arrange files and see how many people are looking to do that. Lots. Someone at MS should google  windows seven faults and then decide what needs to be in a service pack not what one or two geeks whine to them about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omoronovo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-48277</link>
		<dc:creator>Omoronovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-48277</guid>
		<description>That is not actually a bug sir, its just a default setting that I guess you haven&#039;t Googled how to change. Open your network connections (Network and Sharing centre, then click Change Adapter Settings at left), press alt and click the Advanced menu &gt; Advanced Settings. In the top box, move whatever connection you want to have priority on, to the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess as a suggestion this menu/option could be easier to find, but just because its difficult to find does not make it a bug in the code. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the xbox live comment, when you first set up a network at home, you get the choice to make all future networks show up as public. If you tick that box there is NO WAY to change it. If Windows cannot recognise the network that it is connecting to, (as in, can&#039;t recognise its a home network), then for security reasons it will default to the public ruleset for said network. A single point-to-point Ethernet network (using crossover or spliced Ethernet cables) is very difficult to recognise, as the network would usually be set up and maintained by the router or switch the devices are connected to. With a direct connection there is no such control. Even in such a case, there is no reason why you cannot use ICS with a public network type, you simply have to change the public network settings in Network and Sharing Centre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I apologise for this half-rant, but I at least hope you take the information here and use it to fix the &quot;bugs&quot; you are experiencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not actually a bug sir, its just a default setting that I guess you haven&#39;t Googled how to change. Open your network connections (Network and Sharing centre, then click Change Adapter Settings at left), press alt and click the Advanced menu &gt; Advanced Settings. In the top box, move whatever connection you want to have priority on, to the top.</p>
<p>I guess as a suggestion this menu/option could be easier to find, but just because its difficult to find does not make it a bug in the code. </p>
<p>As for the xbox live comment, when you first set up a network at home, you get the choice to make all future networks show up as public. If you tick that box there is NO WAY to change it. If Windows cannot recognise the network that it is connecting to, (as in, can&#39;t recognise its a home network), then for security reasons it will default to the public ruleset for said network. A single point-to-point Ethernet network (using crossover or spliced Ethernet cables) is very difficult to recognise, as the network would usually be set up and maintained by the router or switch the devices are connected to. With a direct connection there is no such control. Even in such a case, there is no reason why you cannot use ICS with a public network type, you simply have to change the public network settings in Network and Sharing Centre.</p>
<p>I apologise for this half-rant, but I at least hope you take the information here and use it to fix the &#8220;bugs&#8221; you are experiencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omoronovo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-46080</link>
		<dc:creator>Omoronovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-46080</guid>
		<description>That is not actually a bug sir, its just a default setting that I guess you haven&#039;t Googled how to change. Open your network connections (Network and Sharing centre, then click Change Adapter Settings at left), press alt and click the Advanced menu &gt; Advanced Settings. In the top box, move whatever connection you want to have priority on, to the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess as a suggestion this menu/option could be easier to find, but just because its difficult to find does not make it a bug in the code. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the xbox live comment, when you first set up a network at home, you get the choice to make all future networks show up as public. If you tick that box there is NO WAY to change it. If Windows cannot recognise the network that it is connecting to, (as in, can&#039;t recognise its a home network), then for security reasons it will default to the public ruleset for said network. A single point-to-point Ethernet network (using crossover or spliced Ethernet cables) is very difficult to recognise, as the network would usually be set up and maintained by the router or switch the devices are connected to. With a direct connection there is no such control. Even in such a case, there is no reason why you cannot use ICS with a public network type, you simply have to change the public network settings in Network and Sharing Centre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I apologise for this half-rant, but I at least hope you take the information here and use it to fix the &quot;bugs&quot; you are experiencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not actually a bug sir, its just a default setting that I guess you haven&#39;t Googled how to change. Open your network connections (Network and Sharing centre, then click Change Adapter Settings at left), press alt and click the Advanced menu &gt; Advanced Settings. In the top box, move whatever connection you want to have priority on, to the top.</p>
<p>I guess as a suggestion this menu/option could be easier to find, but just because its difficult to find does not make it a bug in the code. </p>
<p>As for the xbox live comment, when you first set up a network at home, you get the choice to make all future networks show up as public. If you tick that box there is NO WAY to change it. If Windows cannot recognise the network that it is connecting to, (as in, can&#39;t recognise its a home network), then for security reasons it will default to the public ruleset for said network. A single point-to-point Ethernet network (using crossover or spliced Ethernet cables) is very difficult to recognise, as the network would usually be set up and maintained by the router or switch the devices are connected to. With a direct connection there is no such control. Even in such a case, there is no reason why you cannot use ICS with a public network type, you simply have to change the public network settings in Network and Sharing Centre.</p>
<p>I apologise for this half-rant, but I at least hope you take the information here and use it to fix the &#8220;bugs&#8221; you are experiencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boise, Idaho Flat Fee MLS &#124; Idaho Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-45971</link>
		<dc:creator>Boise, Idaho Flat Fee MLS &#124; Idaho Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45971</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? | Windows 7 News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chieftain20</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-45968</link>
		<dc:creator>chieftain20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45968</guid>
		<description>Yeah the homegroup stuff does need worked on. Like my two computers I have (desktop, and laptop) both run wireless N at 130Mbps, but both have Gigabit Lan cards in them. I have a homegroup set up between the two, and for some reason they like to use the wireless N (the slow one) to transfer files from one to another. Sure it would work if the files were under 10MB, but most of the time I&#039;m transferring 20GB+ over to my desktop. And for this reason I have an ethernet cable plugged into both, and for this to work, I have to disable the Wireless on both just to get the file transfers set up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when using ICS on my laptop for my 360 to run XBL, why is it that sometimes the Local Area Connection defaults to the &quot;Public&quot; profile and you can&#039;t change it which makes it impossible to connect to XBL? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously Microsoft, if you want to brag about Homegroup being so good, work out the bugs first. Its too big of a hassle on the standard user to try and fix this stuff, let alone a computer geek who has to google to figure this stuff out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the homegroup stuff does need worked on. Like my two computers I have (desktop, and laptop) both run wireless N at 130Mbps, but both have Gigabit Lan cards in them. I have a homegroup set up between the two, and for some reason they like to use the wireless N (the slow one) to transfer files from one to another. Sure it would work if the files were under 10MB, but most of the time I&#39;m transferring 20GB+ over to my desktop. And for this reason I have an ethernet cable plugged into both, and for this to work, I have to disable the Wireless on both just to get the file transfers set up.</p>
<p>And when using ICS on my laptop for my 360 to run XBL, why is it that sometimes the Local Area Connection defaults to the &#8220;Public&#8221; profile and you can&#39;t change it which makes it impossible to connect to XBL? </p>
<p>Seriously Microsoft, if you want to brag about Homegroup being so good, work out the bugs first. Its too big of a hassle on the standard user to try and fix this stuff, let alone a computer geek who has to google to figure this stuff out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZippityDragon</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-45958</link>
		<dc:creator>ZippityDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45958</guid>
		<description>They are going to need some support for USB 3.0 eventually at the very least. I&#039;m not sure they really need a service pack yet though. I, for one, had very bad luck with Vista SP1 and 2, although I barely gave them a chance before going back to XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are going to need some support for USB 3.0 eventually at the very least. I&#39;m not sure they really need a service pack yet though. I, for one, had very bad luck with Vista SP1 and 2, although I barely gave them a chance before going back to XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-45954</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45954</guid>
		<description>No. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. <img src='http://www.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I need a web page hit counter, but I need it to tell me the number of hits from only one page.? &#124; Easy Traffic Steps Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-2/#comment-45932</link>
		<dc:creator>I need a web page hit counter, but I need it to tell me the number of hits from only one page.? &#124; Easy Traffic Steps Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45932</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? | Windows 7 News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vintage geek gift guide - Network World Fusion &#171; ventura</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45922</link>
		<dc:creator>Vintage geek gift guide - Network World Fusion &#171; ventura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45922</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 is, hands down, one of Microsoft’s best launched OSes, by which I mean, it’s the first Windows version that I have ever felt comfortable recommending to people on its release date. Both Windows XP and Windows Vista had numerous computery stuff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 is, hands down, one of Microsoft’s best launched OSes, by which I mean, it’s the first Windows version that I have ever felt comfortable recommending to people on its release date. Both Windows XP and Windows Vista had numerous computery stuff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skagway-Yakutat-Angoon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google to Hold an Anything-Bing-Can-Do-We-Can-Do-Better Search Event &#8211; All Things Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45909</link>
		<dc:creator>Skagway-Yakutat-Angoon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google to Hold an Anything-Bing-Can-Do-We-Can-Do-Better Search Event &#8211; All Things Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45909</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 is, hands down, one of Microsoft’s best launched OSes, by which I mean, it’s the first Windows version that I have ever felt comfortable recommending to people on its release date. Both Windows XP and Windows Vista had numerous items for discussion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 is, hands down, one of Microsoft’s best launched OSes, by which I mean, it’s the first Windows version that I have ever felt comfortable recommending to people on its release date. Both Windows XP and Windows Vista had numerous items for discussion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45910</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45910</guid>
		<description>yeah homegroup is cool but it&#039;s kinda hit or mis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah homegroup is cool but it&#39;s kinda hit or mis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45887</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45887</guid>
		<description>[...] Go here to see the original: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go here to see the original: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? | Windows 7 News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News &#124; Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45886</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News &#124; Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45886</guid>
		<description>[...] More: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? &#124; Windows 7 News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More: Does Windows 7 Need a Service Pack? | Windows 7 News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yolarrydabomb</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45864</link>
		<dc:creator>yolarrydabomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45864</guid>
		<description>Homegroup fix&#039;s and better printer support.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I go with Jotin comment too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homegroup fix&#39;s and better printer support.</p>
<p>I go with Jotin comment too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jotin</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/12/31/does-windows-7-need-a-service-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-45853</link>
		<dc:creator>jotin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=6571#comment-45853</guid>
		<description>I am waiting for full blu ray support, better wireless settings, more and quick power options and better library management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for full blu ray support, better wireless settings, more and quick power options and better library management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/29 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Object Caching 645/657 objects using apc

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 09:21:34 -->
