<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 8 &#8211; Rumors and Does Robert Morgan Exist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 8 – 128bit Rumours Were Fake? &#171; Windows 8</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-2/#comment-56576</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 8 – 128bit Rumours Were Fake? &#171; Windows 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-56576</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 8.  As George has stated on our sister site, the official position from Microsoft is that Windows 8 is under development and that&#8217;s all they are prepared to say for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 8.  As George has stated on our sister site, the official position from Microsoft is that Windows 8 is under development and that&#8217;s all they are prepared to say for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omoronovo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-2/#comment-48187</link>
		<dc:creator>Omoronovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-48187</guid>
		<description>Finally someone else who realises how insane an idea this is. I have never replied to any of these &quot;128bit&quot; posts before because I was always under the impression that they were complex troll posts of some kind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have rekindled my faith that some people on here actually know WTF they are talking about. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone else who realises how insane an idea this is. I have never replied to any of these &#8220;128bit&#8221; posts before because I was always under the impression that they were complex troll posts of some kind.</p>
<p>You have rekindled my faith that some people on here actually know WTF they are talking about. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osvaldo Doederlein</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-2/#comment-48186</link>
		<dc:creator>Osvaldo Doederlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-48186</guid>
		<description>NO 128-but CPUs - in Wikipedia&#039;s words, &quot;There are currently no mainstream general-purpose processors built to operate on 128-bit integers or addresses, though a number of processors do operate on 128-bit data.&quot;  The Intel Core2 Duo chip in my laptop has 128-bit SIMD registers (for SSE stuff), and top-end video cards have up to 2x512-bit data bus and also wide SIMD cores. But *none* of these qualify as &quot;128 bit CPUs&quot; or &quot;128 bit computers&quot;. Call me again when you have a motherboard&amp;CPU that can handle 2^128 bytes of memory - I don&#039;t even demand capacity for that much physical memory, virtual capacity will do fine. Most current 64-bit computers have a much smaller number of address lines in the chipset so they can&#039;t be configured with 2^64 bytes of physical RAM; but the OS can manage all this virtual space if you have a big enough pagefile. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, 128 bits are something as big, that you won&#039;t be able to buy any system, even supercomputer, with this much DISK space, let alone memory. And this limit will NOT be surpassed in the next decades or even millenia. Check &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_storage_are_you&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_stor...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO 128-but CPUs &#8211; in Wikipedia&#39;s words, &#8220;There are currently no mainstream general-purpose processors built to operate on 128-bit integers or addresses, though a number of processors do operate on 128-bit data.&#8221;  The Intel Core2 Duo chip in my laptop has 128-bit SIMD registers (for SSE stuff), and top-end video cards have up to 2&#215;512-bit data bus and also wide SIMD cores. But *none* of these qualify as &#8220;128 bit CPUs&#8221; or &#8220;128 bit computers&#8221;. Call me again when you have a motherboard&#038;CPU that can handle 2^128 bytes of memory &#8211; I don&#39;t even demand capacity for that much physical memory, virtual capacity will do fine. Most current 64-bit computers have a much smaller number of address lines in the chipset so they can&#39;t be configured with 2^64 bytes of physical RAM; but the OS can manage all this virtual space if you have a big enough pagefile. </p>
<p>BTW, 128 bits are something as big, that you won&#39;t be able to buy any system, even supercomputer, with this much DISK space, let alone memory. And this limit will NOT be surpassed in the next decades or even millenia. Check <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_storage_are_you" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_stor&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omoronovo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43858</link>
		<dc:creator>Omoronovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43858</guid>
		<description>Finally someone else who realises how insane an idea this is. I have never replied to any of these &quot;128bit&quot; posts before because I was always under the impression that they were complex troll posts of some kind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have rekindled my faith that some people on here actually know WTF they are talking about. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone else who realises how insane an idea this is. I have never replied to any of these &#8220;128bit&#8221; posts before because I was always under the impression that they were complex troll posts of some kind.</p>
<p>You have rekindled my faith that some people on here actually know WTF they are talking about. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osvaldo Doederlein</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43857</link>
		<dc:creator>Osvaldo Doederlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43857</guid>
		<description>NO 128-but CPUs - in Wikipedia&#039;s words, &quot;There are currently no mainstream general-purpose processors built to operate on 128-bit integers or addresses, though a number of processors do operate on 128-bit data.&quot;  The Intel Core2 Duo chip in my laptop has 128-bit SIMD registers (for SSE stuff), and top-end video cards have up to 2x512-bit data bus and also wide SIMD cores. But *none* of these qualify as &quot;128 bit CPUs&quot; or &quot;128 bit computers&quot;. Call me again when you have a motherboard&amp;CPU that can handle 2^128 bytes of memory - I don&#039;t even demand capacity for that much physical memory, virtual capacity will do fine. Most current 64-bit computers have a much smaller number of address lines in the chipset so they can&#039;t be configured with 2^64 bytes of physical RAM; but the OS can manage all this virtual space if you have a big enough pagefile. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, 128 bits are something as big, that you won&#039;t be able to buy any system, even supercomputer, with this much DISK space, let alone memory. And this limit will NOT be surpassed in the next decades or even millenia. Check &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_storage_are_you&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_stor...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO 128-but CPUs &#8211; in Wikipedia&#39;s words, &#8220;There are currently no mainstream general-purpose processors built to operate on 128-bit integers or addresses, though a number of processors do operate on 128-bit data.&#8221;  The Intel Core2 Duo chip in my laptop has 128-bit SIMD registers (for SSE stuff), and top-end video cards have up to 2&#215;512-bit data bus and also wide SIMD cores. But *none* of these qualify as &#8220;128 bit CPUs&#8221; or &#8220;128 bit computers&#8221;. Call me again when you have a motherboard&#038;CPU that can handle 2^128 bytes of memory &#8211; I don&#39;t even demand capacity for that much physical memory, virtual capacity will do fine. Most current 64-bit computers have a much smaller number of address lines in the chipset so they can&#39;t be configured with 2^64 bytes of physical RAM; but the OS can manage all this virtual space if you have a big enough pagefile. </p>
<p>BTW, 128 bits are something as big, that you won&#39;t be able to buy any system, even supercomputer, with this much DISK space, let alone memory. And this limit will NOT be surpassed in the next decades or even millenia. Check <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_storage_are_you" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/128_bit_stor&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt_patt</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43824</link>
		<dc:creator>matt_patt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43824</guid>
		<description>there are 128 bit computers. my motherboard supports it and i built my computer this past January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are 128 bit computers. my motherboard supports it and i built my computer this past January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biff</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43803</link>
		<dc:creator>biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43803</guid>
		<description>there are 128-bit cpus, google it, and robert morgan http://www.linkedin.com/in/msftrobertmorgan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are 128-bit cpus, google it, and robert morgan <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/msftrobertmorgan" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/in/msftrobertmorgan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windows 8 128 bit rumours &#124; Windows 8 News</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43783</link>
		<dc:creator>windows 8 128 bit rumours &#124; Windows 8 News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43783</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 8.  As George has stated on our sister site, the official position from Microsoft is that Windows 8 is under development and that&#8217;s all they are prepared to say for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 8.  As George has stated on our sister site, the official position from Microsoft is that Windows 8 is under development and that&#8217;s all they are prepared to say for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osvaldo Doederlein</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43781</link>
		<dc:creator>Osvaldo Doederlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43781</guid>
		<description>Get a clue. There are no 128-bit CPUs. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get a clue. There are no 128-bit CPUs. <img src='http://cdn5.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows8 – Rumors and Does Robert Morgan Exist? &#124; Windows 7 News</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/26/windows8-rumors-and-does-robert-morgan-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-43773</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows8 – Rumors and Does Robert Morgan Exist? &#124; Windows 7 News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5870#comment-43773</guid>
		<description>[...] The full story can be found on Windows 7 News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The full story can be found on Windows 7 News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/22 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc
Object Caching 560/574 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.windows7news.com

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 13:15:04 -->
