<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To 64 or Not to 64, That Was My Question.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Under Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-2/#comment-107032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Under Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 05:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-107032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dark Under Eye Circle...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]removed in just 30 days of free treatment[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dark Under Eye Circle&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]removed in just 30 days of free treatment[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBooks</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-2/#comment-106445</link>
		<dc:creator>eBooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-106445</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;eBook Reader...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]download eBook through your wifi or 3g e-reader[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>eBook Reader&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]download eBook through your wifi or 3g e-reader[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Glucose Monitors</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-2/#comment-104837</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Glucose Monitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 02:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-104837</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free Glucose Monitors...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Diabetes is at an all-time high in America[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free Glucose Monitors&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Diabetes is at an all-time high in America[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-2/#comment-46690</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-46690</guid>
		<description>Try to research the apps you plan to use before deciding. Many big apps like Microsofts own Visual Studio and Visual Basic won&#039;t even install on 64 bit systems. So some microsoft apps lose microsoft compatibility, go figure. I&#039;ve had problems with several other programs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to research the apps you plan to use before deciding. Many big apps like Microsofts own Visual Studio and Visual Basic won&#39;t even install on 64 bit systems. So some microsoft apps lose microsoft compatibility, go figure. I&#39;ve had problems with several other programs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-43898</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-43898</guid>
		<description>Try to research the apps you plan to use before deciding. Many big apps like Microsofts own Visual Studio and Visual Basic won&#039;t even install on 64 bit systems. So some microsoft apps lose microsoft compatibility, go figure. I&#039;ve had problems with several other programs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to research the apps you plan to use before deciding. Many big apps like Microsofts own Visual Studio and Visual Basic won&#39;t even install on 64 bit systems. So some microsoft apps lose microsoft compatibility, go figure. I&#39;ve had problems with several other programs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TuneUp</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42887</link>
		<dc:creator>TuneUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42887</guid>
		<description>There are a few other advantages to 64-bit you left out. With 64-bit computing you have more processing power and a performance advantage since applications can process huge data operations more quickly. You also have more security with the 64-bit version of Windows 7 because it comes with the Kernel Patch Protection and Data Execution Protection features. Of course there are other issues to consider with 64-bit including possible driver issues, higher memory consumption and no compatibility with 16-bit software. If you are thinking about installing the 64-bit version of Windows 7, this post might help you out http://bit.ly/1XCLPT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few other advantages to 64-bit you left out. With 64-bit computing you have more processing power and a performance advantage since applications can process huge data operations more quickly. You also have more security with the 64-bit version of Windows 7 because it comes with the Kernel Patch Protection and Data Execution Protection features. Of course there are other issues to consider with 64-bit including possible driver issues, higher memory consumption and no compatibility with 16-bit software. If you are thinking about installing the 64-bit version of Windows 7, this post might help you out <a href="http://bit.ly/1XCLPT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1XCLPT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prathamesh</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-111488</link>
		<dc:creator>Prathamesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-111488</guid>
		<description>Absolutely not. The minimum system requirement can be said to be 2GB RAM (Though u can run it comfortably even with less RAM)...The 4GB thing pops up just to take advantage of the 4th GB onwards which 64bit system offers &amp; 32bit cannot offer. If u run RAM intensive apps then its a big boon cause u use less or no swap file...If u r a net surfer u wont feel the difference. If u run a 32bit app say sketchup on 64bit OS...it will still use only 3 GB RAM approx &amp; wont use the rest even if ur system has 8GB RAM...so to take full advantage of 64bit u need native 64bit apps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely not. The minimum system requirement can be said to be 2GB RAM (Though u can run it comfortably even with less RAM)&#8230;The 4GB thing pops up just to take advantage of the 4th GB onwards which 64bit system offers &amp; 32bit cannot offer. If u run RAM intensive apps then its a big boon cause u use less or no swap file&#8230;If u r a net surfer u wont feel the difference. If u run a 32bit app say sketchup on 64bit OS&#8230;it will still use only 3 GB RAM approx &amp; wont use the rest even if ur system has 8GB RAM&#8230;so to take full advantage of 64bit u need native 64bit apps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You_SUCK</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42736</link>
		<dc:creator>You_SUCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42736</guid>
		<description>64 Bit OSes SUCK.&lt;br&gt;32 Bit FTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>64 Bit OSes SUCK.<br />32 Bit FTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42710</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42710</guid>
		<description>I am currently running windows 7 64 bit with 2 gb of ram and 512mb of video ram. And 7 is working like a champ. so your statement about needing 4 gbs. is completely inaccurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently running windows 7 64 bit with 2 gb of ram and 512mb of video ram. And 7 is working like a champ. so your statement about needing 4 gbs. is completely inaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmers</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42580</link>
		<dc:creator>farmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42580</guid>
		<description>Just a small correction to a statement within the article. It would be more accurate to say &#039;early reports from sources within Microsoft suggest that Windows 7 may be the final Windows version to ship with a 32 bit option&#039;. None of the leaks so far about Windows 8 have been backed up by any official statement from Microsoft, so it&#039;s wrong to imply they&#039;ve already made a pronouncement about the future of 32 bit Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small correction to a statement within the article. It would be more accurate to say &#39;early reports from sources within Microsoft suggest that Windows 7 may be the final Windows version to ship with a 32 bit option&#39;. None of the leaks so far about Windows 8 have been backed up by any official statement from Microsoft, so it&#39;s wrong to imply they&#39;ve already made a pronouncement about the future of 32 bit Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gothfebrio</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42561</link>
		<dc:creator>gothfebrio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42561</guid>
		<description>u forgot someting. 32 bit os only allow 2GB Ram per apps/games. even if u have 3gb ram(max on 32 bit). while x64 will allow more than 2gb ram depends on how many ram u have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u forgot someting. 32 bit os only allow 2GB Ram per apps/games. even if u have 3gb ram(max on 32 bit). while x64 will allow more than 2gb ram depends on how many ram u have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lzor</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/11/06/to-64-or-not-to-64-that-was-my-question/comment-page-1/#comment-42558</link>
		<dc:creator>lzor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=5396#comment-42558</guid>
		<description>Just a small correction, from the Windows 7 system requirements page:&lt;br&gt;? 1 gigabyte (GB) RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While you may take advantage of more than 4GB of RAM on a 64 bit version, it is not strictly necessary to run it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small correction, from the Windows 7 system requirements page:<br />? 1 gigabyte (GB) RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)</p>
<p>While you may take advantage of more than 4GB of RAM on a 64 bit version, it is not strictly necessary to run it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/25 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc
Object Caching 589/600 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.windows7news.com

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 11:23:33 -->
