<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Already Working On Windows 7 SP1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Win7 Sp1 &#124; Trends Pics</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-7/#comment-88795</link>
		<dc:creator>Win7 Sp1 &#124; Trends Pics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-88795</guid>
		<description>[...] Working On Windows 7 SP1? windows7news.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Working On Windows 7 SP1? windows7news.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DENNIS HARVEY</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-7/#comment-54560</link>
		<dc:creator>DENNIS HARVEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-54560</guid>
		<description>The worry is that with security patches and the bloating which accompanies Service packs, Windows 7 will become just as slow as Vista is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worry is that with security patches and the bloating which accompanies Service packs, Windows 7 will become just as slow as Vista is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DENNIS HARVEY</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-7/#comment-50080</link>
		<dc:creator>DENNIS HARVEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-50080</guid>
		<description>The worry is that with security patches and the bloating which accompanies Service packs, Windows 7 will become just as slow as Vista is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worry is that with security patches and the bloating which accompanies Service packs, Windows 7 will become just as slow as Vista is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simpsonX</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-7/#comment-30571</link>
		<dc:creator>simpsonX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-30571</guid>
		<description>what was vista then?? was it just an interim OS microsoft just released for a sinister reason?? i mean with windows 7 out who will want to remain with vista considering the low resources and ease 7 provides as compared with windows vista. the battle then will have to be between users of XP and 7. ALTHOUGH I KNOW A LOT OF DIEHARD XP users like me who are already quivering for the release of a more stable version of 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what was vista then?? was it just an interim OS microsoft just released for a sinister reason?? i mean with windows 7 out who will want to remain with vista considering the low resources and ease 7 provides as compared with windows vista. the battle then will have to be between users of XP and 7. ALTHOUGH I KNOW A LOT OF DIEHARD XP users like me who are already quivering for the release of a more stable version of 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simpsonX</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-73748</link>
		<dc:creator>simpsonX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73748</guid>
		<description>what was vista then?? was it just an interim OS microsoft just released for a sinister reason?? i mean with windows 7 out who will want to remain with vista considering the low resources and ease 7 provides as compared with windows vista. the battle then will have to be between users of XP and 7. ALTHOUGH I KNOW A LOT OF DIEHARD XP users like me who are already quivering for the release of a more stable version of 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what was vista then?? was it just an interim OS microsoft just released for a sinister reason?? i mean with windows 7 out who will want to remain with vista considering the low resources and ease 7 provides as compared with windows vista. the battle then will have to be between users of XP and 7. ALTHOUGH I KNOW A LOT OF DIEHARD XP users like me who are already quivering for the release of a more stable version of 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: picasso</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-24745</link>
		<dc:creator>picasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-24745</guid>
		<description>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: picasso</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-73746</link>
		<dc:creator>picasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73746</guid>
		<description>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: picasso</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-73747</link>
		<dc:creator>picasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73747</guid>
		<description>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that microsoft has a winner here! But i have a question how do you actually work with networks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dar3</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-24390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dar3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-24390</guid>
		<description>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dar3</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-73744</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dar3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73744</guid>
		<description>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dar3</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-6/#comment-73745</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dar3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73745</guid>
		<description>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with smilingman above. A lot of bigger corporations wait for the first SP to appear before they even consider getting machines with the new operating system, I guess the SP1 will include whatever will have to be left out to meet the 22nd October release date, which is pretty good move if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-23592</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23592</guid>
		<description>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:

1. Features that were not ready for releases

2. Better and faster service pack development

3. Smaller service packs every year

4. Better 3rd party support before releases

5. Faster IT and security support

These are just my opinions
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.<br />
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:</p>
<p>1. Features that were not ready for releases</p>
<p>2. Better and faster service pack development</p>
<p>3. Smaller service packs every year</p>
<p>4. Better 3rd party support before releases</p>
<p>5. Faster IT and security support</p>
<p>These are just my opinions<br />
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-73742</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73742</guid>
		<description>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:

1. Features that were not ready for releases

2. Better and faster service pack development

3. Smaller service packs every year

4. Better 3rd party support before releases

5. Faster IT and security support

These are just my opinions
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.<br />
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:</p>
<p>1. Features that were not ready for releases</p>
<p>2. Better and faster service pack development</p>
<p>3. Smaller service packs every year</p>
<p>4. Better 3rd party support before releases</p>
<p>5. Faster IT and security support</p>
<p>These are just my opinions<br />
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-73743</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73743</guid>
		<description>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:

1. Features that were not ready for releases

2. Better and faster service pack development

3. Smaller service packs every year

4. Better 3rd party support before releases

5. Faster IT and security support

These are just my opinions
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Win7 for about 4 months and I have had minor issues. Most of those issues are do to legacy hardware, beta drivers and not fully supported software.<br />
If a service pack is already being development that is a good think, here are my thoughts:</p>
<p>1. Features that were not ready for releases</p>
<p>2. Better and faster service pack development</p>
<p>3. Smaller service packs every year</p>
<p>4. Better 3rd party support before releases</p>
<p>5. Faster IT and security support</p>
<p>These are just my opinions<br />
I think MS wants business to adopt Win7 much faster than Vista and this also may translate to more retail sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djalex</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-73738</link>
		<dc:creator>djalex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73738</guid>
		<description>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#039;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#8217;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djalex</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-73739</link>
		<dc:creator>djalex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73739</guid>
		<description>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#039;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#8217;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-5/#comment-23436</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23436</guid>
		<description>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com 

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx 
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx 
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx 

Quote:
As The Site writes, it doesn&#039;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.

Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &quot;something more interesting&quot;.

Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#039;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).

Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  
       
riso 
tnx. Raiker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com </p>
<p>Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch<br />
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200<br />
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx<br />
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx<br />
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
As The Site writes, it doesn&#8217;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.</p>
<p>Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &#8220;something more interesting&#8221;.</p>
<p>Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#8217;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).</p>
<p>Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  </p>
<p>riso<br />
tnx. Raiker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-73740</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73740</guid>
		<description>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com 

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx 
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx 
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx 

Quote:
As The Site writes, it doesn&#039;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.

Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &quot;something more interesting&quot;.

Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#039;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).

Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  
       
riso 
tnx. Raiker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com </p>
<p>Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch<br />
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200<br />
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx<br />
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx<br />
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
As The Site writes, it doesn&#8217;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.</p>
<p>Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &#8220;something more interesting&#8221;.</p>
<p>Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#8217;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).</p>
<p>Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  </p>
<p>riso<br />
tnx. Raiker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-73741</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73741</guid>
		<description>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com 

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx 
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx 
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx 

Quote:
As The Site writes, it doesn&#039;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.

Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &quot;something more interesting&quot;.

Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#039;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).

Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  
       
riso 
tnx. Raiker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok i just read on the other site windows7newsinfo.com </p>
<p>Windows 7 Service Pack 1 branch<br />
7138.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090523-2200<br />
7139.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090526-xxxx<br />
7140.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090527-xxxx<br />
7141.0.winmain_win7ids_sp.090528-xxxx </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
As The Site writes, it doesn&#8217;t currently plan to release any of these SP1 builds.</p>
<p>Also, today is a day of Windows 7 RC2 sign-off. When the situation with RC2 becomes clear, The Site will decide what to release: either SP1 or &#8220;something more interesting&#8221;.</p>
<p>Windows 7 SP1 builds are currently available in the following languages: en-us, de-de, fr-fr, ja-jp, es-es. But Microsoft doesn&#8217;t provide language packs for non-main branches (so as I understand their words, SP1 builds available in 5 languages as images, but no LIPs / LPs for them available).</p>
<p>Windows 7 RTM is planned for the end of july.  </p>
<p>riso<br />
tnx. Raiker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djalex</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-23428</link>
		<dc:creator>djalex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23428</guid>
		<description>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#039;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your wrong SP are not just patches.. Did Windows XP RTM had Firewall ? NO the SP2 added  the firewall feature so don&#8217;t talk crap. I think this is good for them beacouse the bussnises will upgrade when SP1 is realesed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-23414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23414</guid>
		<description>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-73736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73736</guid>
		<description>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-73737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73737</guid>
		<description>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Service Packs do not add features, they are a bunch of patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobisimo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-4/#comment-23412</link>
		<dc:creator>bobisimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23412</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#039;s just the way Microsoft works.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.

I can only believe that&#039;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#039;d be very surprised if they weren&#039;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#039;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#8217;s just the way Microsoft works.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.</p>
<p>I can only believe that&#8217;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#8217;d be very surprised if they weren&#8217;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#8217;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73733</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73733</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#039;s just the way Microsoft works.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.

I can only believe that&#039;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#039;d be very surprised if they weren&#039;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#039;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#8217;s just the way Microsoft works.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.</p>
<p>I can only believe that&#8217;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#8217;d be very surprised if they weren&#8217;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#8217;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73734</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73734</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#039;s just the way Microsoft works.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.

I can only believe that&#039;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#039;d be very surprised if they weren&#039;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#039;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#8217;s just the way Microsoft works.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.</p>
<p>I can only believe that&#8217;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#8217;d be very surprised if they weren&#8217;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#8217;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73735</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#039;s just the way Microsoft works.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.

I can only believe that&#039;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#039;d be very surprised if they weren&#039;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#039;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s photo-shopped or not, most likely there will be an SP1 release sooner or later. That&#8217;s just the way Microsoft works.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft could use it to add new features to the operating system that did not make it into the final product.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, this is what I think. When I worked in software development, it was normal to realize some stuff was taking longer to implement or fix. Other stuff would be flagged as for the patch or next release.</p>
<p>I can only believe that&#8217;s normal behavior and that companies like MS do it as well. I&#8217;d be very surprised if they weren&#8217;t at least fleshing out SP1 before the beta. So now that we&#8217;re at the RC stage, I imagine development on SP1 is taking up the time of at least a few people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-23405</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23405</guid>
		<description>Checked the placing of the &quot;service pack 1&quot; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#039;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).

More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#039;t take a service pack.

Or still photoshop who cares? ;-)

Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked the placing of the &#8220;service pack 1&#8243; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#8217;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).</p>
<p>More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#8217;t take a service pack.</p>
<p>Or still photoshop who cares? <img src='http://cdn5.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73730</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73730</guid>
		<description>Checked the placing of the &quot;service pack 1&quot; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#039;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).

More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#039;t take a service pack.

Or still photoshop who cares? ;-)

Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked the placing of the &#8220;service pack 1&#8243; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#8217;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).</p>
<p>More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#8217;t take a service pack.</p>
<p>Or still photoshop who cares? <img src='http://cdn5.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73731</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73731</guid>
		<description>Checked the placing of the &quot;service pack 1&quot; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#039;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).

More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#039;t take a service pack.

Or still photoshop who cares? ;-)

Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked the placing of the &#8220;service pack 1&#8243; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#8217;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).</p>
<p>More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#8217;t take a service pack.</p>
<p>Or still photoshop who cares? <img src='http://cdn5.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-73732</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73732</guid>
		<description>Checked the placing of the &quot;service pack 1&quot; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#039;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).

More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#039;t take a service pack.

Or still photoshop who cares? ;-)

Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked the placing of the &#8220;service pack 1&#8243; in a blowup of the pic, and it is aligned horizontally and vertically perfectly with the other text up to the pixel, so that&#8217;s no indication at all (can still be a decent photoshop of cource).</p>
<p>More likely Microsoft is testing the use of a service pack with test files so they can see the way it installs. A bit the same as testing how well an OS upgrade works compared to a fresh install. No use developing an RTM if it later can&#8217;t take a service pack.</p>
<p>Or still photoshop who cares? <img src='http://cdn5.windows7news.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or they are really crazy and actually are working on a service pack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-3/#comment-23404</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23404</guid>
		<description>Every windows release is a service pack.

Some are just called service packs.

We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every windows release is a service pack.</p>
<p>Some are just called service packs.</p>
<p>We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73727</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73727</guid>
		<description>Every windows release is a service pack.

Some are just called service packs.

We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every windows release is a service pack.</p>
<p>Some are just called service packs.</p>
<p>We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73728</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73728</guid>
		<description>Every windows release is a service pack.

Some are just called service packs.

We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every windows release is a service pack.</p>
<p>Some are just called service packs.</p>
<p>We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73729</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73729</guid>
		<description>Every windows release is a service pack.

Some are just called service packs.

We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every windows release is a service pack.</p>
<p>Some are just called service packs.</p>
<p>We just got Vista SP2. Must assume that a little bit of RC7 is in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-23402</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23402</guid>
		<description>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73724</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73724</guid>
		<description>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73725</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73725</guid>
		<description>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-2/#comment-73726</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73726</guid>
		<description>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you look at the photo it looks as if the line service pack 1 is a litle offset to the left. i say it is a photoshoped image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deABREU</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-23387</link>
		<dc:creator>deABREU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23387</guid>
		<description>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?
geez..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?<br />
geez..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deABREU</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-73721</link>
		<dc:creator>deABREU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73721</guid>
		<description>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?
geez..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?<br />
geez..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deABREU</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-73722</link>
		<dc:creator>deABREU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73722</guid>
		<description>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?
geez..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?<br />
geez..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deABREU</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-73723</link>
		<dc:creator>deABREU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73723</guid>
		<description>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?
geez..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, have you guys ever heard of a new prgram called PHOTOSHOP?<br />
geez..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeShon</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-23381</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeShon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-23381</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#039;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.

Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#8217;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.</p>
<p>Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeShon</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-73719</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeShon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73719</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#039;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.

Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#8217;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.</p>
<p>Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeShon</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-already-working-on-windows-7-sp1/comment-page-1/#comment-73720</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeShon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=2051#comment-73720</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#039;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.

Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a smart and a dumb move all in one, but overall it&#8217;s smart. Yeah, lets ship so many copies of the os out to retailers, but not too many because we will give them SP1 soon and the others who have already purchase will get the free upgrade. It sounds easy and effective.</p>
<p>Basically they are going to give you the core product to work with and by others giving a load of feedback it looks like the core product should do well. While your playing around with that they now have time to have fun adding new features and fixes(hopefully minor) that consumers want and need. Then up pops SP1. TAAAA DAAAA!!!! lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 23/58 queries in 0.023 seconds using apc
Object Caching 1181/1190 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.windows7news.com

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 12:24:52 -->
