<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Intel CPUs Support Virtual XP Mode?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanm90</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-4/#comment-48248</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanm90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-48248</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed Windows XP SP2 into Virtual PC 2007 running the RC of windows 7. Also, My computer is running the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 which is listed as a &#039;NO&#039; on this list. Is what I&#039;m doing different than this &#039;XP mode&#039; that this article is talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve installed Windows XP SP2 into Virtual PC 2007 running the RC of windows 7. Also, My computer is running the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 which is listed as a &#39;NO&#39; on this list. Is what I&#39;m doing different than this &#39;XP mode&#39; that this article is talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanm90</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-4/#comment-40330</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanm90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-40330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed Windows XP SP2 into Virtual PC 2007 running the RC of windows 7. Also, My computer is running the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 which is listed as a &#039;NO&#039; on this list. Is what I&#039;m doing different than this &#039;XP mode&#039; that this article is talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve installed Windows XP SP2 into Virtual PC 2007 running the RC of windows 7. Also, My computer is running the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 which is listed as a &#39;NO&#39; on this list. Is what I&#39;m doing different than this &#39;XP mode&#39; that this article is talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WINDOWS 7 TUTORIAL</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-4/#comment-28997</link>
		<dc:creator>WINDOWS 7 TUTORIAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-28997</guid>
		<description>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-3/#comment-11124</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-11124</guid>
		<description>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#039;s out now

1:20am est

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&amp;friendID=82370043&amp;albumID=1005432&amp;imageID=47138831</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#8217;s out now</p>
<p>1:20am est</p>
<p><a href="http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831" rel="nofollow">http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-3/#comment-73102</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73102</guid>
		<description>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#039;s out now

1:20am est

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&amp;friendID=82370043&amp;albumID=1005432&amp;imageID=47138831</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#8217;s out now</p>
<p>1:20am est</p>
<p><a href="http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831" rel="nofollow">http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-3/#comment-73103</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73103</guid>
		<description>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#039;s out now

1:20am est

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&amp;friendID=82370043&amp;albumID=1005432&amp;imageID=47138831</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#8217;s out now</p>
<p>1:20am est</p>
<p><a href="http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831" rel="nofollow">http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-3/#comment-73104</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73104</guid>
		<description>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#039;s out now

1:20am est

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&amp;friendID=82370043&amp;albumID=1005432&amp;imageID=47138831</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>downloading the RC right now from the technet site public download this is a screen shot of the download for proof it&#8217;s out now</p>
<p>1:20am est</p>
<p><a href="http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831" rel="nofollow">http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&#038;friendID=82370043&#038;albumID=1005432&#038;imageID=47138831</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-3/#comment-10969</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10969</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#039;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. 

This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#039;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#039;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice - you will see no positive comments. 

Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported - lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.

Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#8217;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. </p>
<p>This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#8217;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#8217;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice &#8211; you will see no positive comments. </p>
<p>Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported &#8211; lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.</p>
<p>Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73099</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73099</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#039;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. 

This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#039;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#039;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice - you will see no positive comments. 

Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported - lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.

Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#8217;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. </p>
<p>This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#8217;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#8217;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice &#8211; you will see no positive comments. </p>
<p>Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported &#8211; lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.</p>
<p>Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73100</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73100</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#039;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. 

This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#039;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#039;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice - you will see no positive comments. 

Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported - lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.

Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#8217;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. </p>
<p>This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#8217;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#8217;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice &#8211; you will see no positive comments. </p>
<p>Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported &#8211; lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.</p>
<p>Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73101</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73101</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#039;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. 

This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#039;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#039;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice - you will see no positive comments. 

Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported - lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.

Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that Windows Virtual PC (which Virtual XP uses) does not run on a T6400 T6400 CPU. Oddly enough, it will install and only will tell you it can&#8217;t run it when you try to start the application.  Beta or not, it seems a bit strange that it does not run a screen for acceptable processors before installing.  This could prove to be very important since you need to uninstall Virtual PC 2007 (if on your machine) before installing Windows Virtual PC and some people are having trouble reinstalling Virtual PC 2007 later. </p>
<p>This sounded impressive, but given the list of CPUs that won&#8217;t run it is (pretty much) a checklist of the one&#8217;s businesses and average consumers actually buy, I think it will have little impact beyond annoying people who will assume it should work.  BTW, if you check out the Technet forums you will see very few positive comments.  Actually, that was being nice &#8211; you will see no positive comments. </p>
<p>Personally, I am hoping that since it is a beta, they will not release it as final until well after Windows 7 is out. That will give time to work out the myriad of issues being reported &#8211; lots of installation problems, crashes, and performance/resource utilization problems.  They can always let people who really want it have it as a beta with a disclaimer.</p>
<p>Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quali Cpu Intel supportano la nuova modalitÃ  Virtual XP Mode di Windows 7 &#124; Trucchetti.com</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-10862</link>
		<dc:creator>Quali Cpu Intel supportano la nuova modalitÃ  Virtual XP Mode di Windows 7 &#124; Trucchetti.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10862</guid>
		<description>[...] via    Per scaricare piÃ¹ velocemente questi e altri files Clicca QUI  e installa GRATUITAMENTE Speed Downloading! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via    Per scaricare piÃ¹ velocemente questi e altri files Clicca QUI  e installa GRATUITAMENTE Speed Downloading! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-10723</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10723</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia:
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&quot;Orleans&quot;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&quot;Windsor&quot;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&quot;Windsor&quot;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.

You can use this tool to check:
http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia:<br />
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&#8220;Orleans&#8221;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.</p>
<p>You can use this tool to check:<br />
<a href="http://www.grc.com/securable.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73096</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73096</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia:
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&quot;Orleans&quot;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&quot;Windsor&quot;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&quot;Windsor&quot;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.

You can use this tool to check:
http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia:<br />
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&#8220;Orleans&#8221;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.</p>
<p>You can use this tool to check:<br />
<a href="http://www.grc.com/securable.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73097</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73097</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia:
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&quot;Orleans&quot;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&quot;Windsor&quot;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&quot;Windsor&quot;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.

You can use this tool to check:
http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia:<br />
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&#8220;Orleans&#8221;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.</p>
<p>You can use this tool to check:<br />
<a href="http://www.grc.com/securable.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73098</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73098</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia:
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&quot;Orleans&quot;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&quot;Windsor&quot;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&quot;Windsor&quot;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.

You can use this tool to check:
http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia:<br />
On May 23, 2006, AMD released the Athlon 64 (&#8220;Orleans&#8221;), the Athlon 64 X2 (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) and the Athlon 64 FX (&#8220;Windsor&#8221;) as the first AMD processors to support AMD-V. Prior processors do not have AMD-V.</p>
<p>You can use this tool to check:<br />
<a href="http://www.grc.com/securable.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grc.com/securable.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-10588</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10588</guid>
		<description>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#039;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#8217;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73093</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73093</guid>
		<description>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#039;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#8217;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73094</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73094</guid>
		<description>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#039;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#8217;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-73095</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73095</guid>
		<description>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#039;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Xeon. I know mine have virtualisation, but I guess Xeon aren&#8217;t listed because they all support virtualisation anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murfreesboro Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-2/#comment-10351</link>
		<dc:creator>Murfreesboro Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10351</guid>
		<description>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murfreesboro Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73090</link>
		<dc:creator>Murfreesboro Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73090</guid>
		<description>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murfreesboro Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73091</link>
		<dc:creator>Murfreesboro Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73091</guid>
		<description>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murfreesboro Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73092</link>
		<dc:creator>Murfreesboro Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73092</guid>
		<description>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will XP mode pose any security risks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freaky</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-10298</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-10298</guid>
		<description>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freaky</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73087</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73087</guid>
		<description>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freaky</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73088</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73088</guid>
		<description>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freaky</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/05/04/which-intel-cpus-support-virtual-xp-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-73089</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=1782#comment-73089</guid>
		<description>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about AMD? Do they have any support for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 20/42 queries in 0.017 seconds using apc
Object Caching 864/880 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.windows7news.com

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 11:44:17 -->
