Comments on: Internet Explorer 8 Can Be Uninstalled In Latest Windows 7 Build http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/ Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers & Guides Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Internet Explorer 9 to Require Windows 7 SP1 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-79383 Internet Explorer 9 to Require Windows 7 SP1 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:44:37 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-79383 [...] Internet Explorer 8 Can Be Uninstalled In Latest Windows 7 Build [...] [...] Internet Explorer 8 Can Be Uninstalled In Latest Windows 7 Build [...]

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-30420 smilingman Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:40:06 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-30420 It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use. All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them. IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards. It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use.
All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them.
IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-71951 smilingman Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:40:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71951 It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use. All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them. IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards. It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use.
All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them.
IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-71952 smilingman Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:40:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71952 It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use. All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them. IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards. It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use.
All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them.
IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-71953 smilingman Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:40:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71953 It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use. All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them. IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards. It does not matter if the code is open source or priority code some one is going to hack it or write a virus. The tools need to write good and bad code is everywhere and  getting easier to use.
All version of IE are the most attacked web browsers in use and I for one would like to be able to uninstall it completely. I use to have a few programs that only worked with IE and I stopped using them once I switch to Firefox and found alternatives to them.
IE8 is not bad, but it is way behind on features and just started to support basic web standards.

]]> By: rover3500 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-10/#comment-30307 rover3500 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:53:40 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-30307 I've tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can't access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn't matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os. I’ve tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can’t access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn’t matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os.

]]> By: rover3500 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-9/#comment-71947 rover3500 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:53:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71947 I've tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can't access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn't matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os. I’ve tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can’t access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn’t matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os.

]]> By: rover3500 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-9/#comment-71948 rover3500 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:53:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71948 I've tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can't access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn't matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os. I’ve tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can’t access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn’t matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os.

]]> By: rover3500 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-9/#comment-71949 rover3500 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:53:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71949 I've tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can't access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn't matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os. I’ve tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can’t access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn’t matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os.

]]> By: rover3500 http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-9/#comment-71950 rover3500 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:53:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71950 I've tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can't access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn't matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os. I’ve tried before to disable ie,but i find there are some programs out there that will only use ie automatically,and if it can’t access it,they come up with an error rather than using the default browser,even though it shouldn’t matter.I suppose they are assuming that ie is going to be on every os.

]]> By: Marcus WIberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-9/#comment-3160 Marcus WIberg Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:51 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3160 When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people... just for the fact that it's free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we're talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the "hackers" to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don't go to sites you shouldn't be on, you won't have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can't believe how stupid people can be. When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people… just for the fact that it’s free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we’re talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the “hackers” to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don’t go to sites you shouldn’t be on, you won’t have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can’t believe how stupid people can be.

]]> By: Marcus WIberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71943 Marcus WIberg Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71943 When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people... just for the fact that it's free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we're talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the "hackers" to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don't go to sites you shouldn't be on, you won't have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can't believe how stupid people can be. When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people… just for the fact that it’s free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we’re talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the “hackers” to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don’t go to sites you shouldn’t be on, you won’t have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can’t believe how stupid people can be.

]]> By: Marcus WIberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71944 Marcus WIberg Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71944 When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people... just for the fact that it's free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we're talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the "hackers" to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don't go to sites you shouldn't be on, you won't have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can't believe how stupid people can be. When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people… just for the fact that it’s free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we’re talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the “hackers” to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don’t go to sites you shouldn’t be on, you won’t have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can’t believe how stupid people can be.

]]> By: Marcus WIberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71945 Marcus WIberg Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71945 When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people... just for the fact that it's free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we're talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the "hackers" to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don't go to sites you shouldn't be on, you won't have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can't believe how stupid people can be. When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people… just for the fact that it’s free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we’re talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the “hackers” to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don’t go to sites you shouldn’t be on, you won’t have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can’t believe how stupid people can be.

]]> By: Marcus WIberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71946 Marcus WIberg Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71946 When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people... just for the fact that it's free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we're talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the "hackers" to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don't go to sites you shouldn't be on, you won't have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can't believe how stupid people can be. When it comes to freeware and open source apps they will always be supported by people… just for the fact that it’s free. Sure free is great but is it really worth taking all the risks? Come on we’re talking about a open source,  everybody can take a look at the code and then create vulnerable code against it.  For example with MS browser IE,  no one got access the the source code except for MS, which makes it way harder for the “hackers” to figure out how to make their spyware/virus etc vulnerable. But on the other hand is MS operative system is the most used one, which makes it the biggest target. But if you keep your Windows, security software up to date and of course don’t go to sites you shouldn’t be on, you won’t have any problems with viruses and other vulnerable applications that can hurt your computer. But does kids take our advice? Of course not they sooner or later find how easy it is to get songs,movies,games, applications etc of the internet. Then after a while their computer is full tanked of vulnerable shit and then they wonder why??! (Of course they blame it on Windows)  Can’t believe how stupid people can be.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-3124 smilingman Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:07:16 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3124 I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security. No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area. Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims. I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security.
No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area.
Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71939 smilingman Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:07:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71939 I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security. No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area. Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims. I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security.
No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area.
Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71940 smilingman Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:07:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71940 I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security. No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area. Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims. I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security.
No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area.
Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71941 smilingman Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:07:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71941 I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security. No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area. Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims. I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security.
No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area.
Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-8/#comment-71942 smilingman Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:07:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71942 I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security. No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area. Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims. I have used Firefox for years and I never had any security issues with it. It has out performed IE  in every possible way including security.
No program is 100% security but I believe Firefox is 2 steps ahead if IE in this area.
Please post site pages that have hard facts to the weakness of Firefox. I am sure others here beside myself would like to read those claims.

]]> By: Marcus Wiberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-3108 Marcus Wiberg Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:39:28 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3108 IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it "turn Windows features on or off" and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it's real deal i'm on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it's a great webbrowser. IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it ”turn Windows features on or off” and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it’s real deal i’m on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it’s a great webbrowser.

]]> By: Marcus Wiberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-71935 Marcus Wiberg Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:39:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71935 IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it "turn Windows features on or off" and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it's real deal i'm on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it's a great webbrowser. IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it ”turn Windows features on or off” and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it’s real deal i’m on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it’s a great webbrowser.

]]> By: Marcus Wiberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-71936 Marcus Wiberg Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:39:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71936 IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it "turn Windows features on or off" and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it's real deal i'm on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it's a great webbrowser. IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it ”turn Windows features on or off” and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it’s real deal i’m on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it’s a great webbrowser.

]]> By: Marcus Wiberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-71937 Marcus Wiberg Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:39:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71937 IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it "turn Windows features on or off" and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it's real deal i'm on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it's a great webbrowser. IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it ”turn Windows features on or off” and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it’s real deal i’m on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it’s a great webbrowser.

]]> By: Marcus Wiberg http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-71938 Marcus Wiberg Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:39:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71938 IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it "turn Windows features on or off" and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it's real deal i'm on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it's a great webbrowser. IE cannot be uninstalled.. it can be turned off, thats might also be why they call it ”turn Windows features on or off” and not uninstall. And come one this is not a rumor it’s real deal i’m on build 7048 right now but why should you turn it off? Firefox is reported to be the most vulnerable webbrowser out there and Chrome is not very secure yet even though it’s a great webbrowser.

]]> By: Alan http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-7/#comment-3102 Alan Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:00:59 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3102 <strong>@</strong><strong>hackitect</strong> <strong> </strong> A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect. In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories. <strong>1. Drivers for installed hardware</strong>. This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse. <strong>2. Generic drivers for common hardware.</strong> This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don't have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn't mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with. What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won't copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It's not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn't try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc... It's assumed that if you install new hardware you're intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. <em></em> <em>"How many drivers are really required?" -<strong> A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.</strong></em> As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to "bloat" as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM's I'm sure you're intelligent enough to be able to remove this "bloat" by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies. Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable. I'm sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims. @hackitect


A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect.
In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories.

1. Drivers for installed hardware.

This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse.

2. Generic drivers for common hardware.

This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don’t have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn’t mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with.

What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won’t copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It’s not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn’t try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc… It’s assumed that if you install new hardware you’re intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. 

“How many drivers are really required?” - A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.

As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to “bloat” as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM’s I’m sure you’re intelligent enough to be able to remove this “bloat” by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies.

Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable.

I’m sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-6/#comment-71931 Omoronovo Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:00:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71931 <strong>@</strong><strong>hackitect</strong> <strong> </strong> A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect. In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories. <strong>1. Drivers for installed hardware</strong>. This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse. <strong>2. Generic drivers for common hardware.</strong> This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don't have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn't mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with. What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won't copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It's not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn't try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc... It's assumed that if you install new hardware you're intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. <em></em> <em>"How many drivers are really required?" -<strong> A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.</strong></em> As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to "bloat" as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM's I'm sure you're intelligent enough to be able to remove this "bloat" by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies. Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable. I'm sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims. @hackitect


A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect.
In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories.

1. Drivers for installed hardware.

This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse.

2. Generic drivers for common hardware.

This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don’t have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn’t mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with.

What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won’t copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It’s not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn’t try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc… It’s assumed that if you install new hardware you’re intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. 
“How many drivers are really required?” - A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.

As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to “bloat” as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM’s I’m sure you’re intelligent enough to be able to remove this “bloat” by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies.

Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable.

I’m sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-6/#comment-71932 Omoronovo Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:00:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71932 <strong>@</strong><strong>hackitect</strong> <strong> </strong> A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect. In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories. <strong>1. Drivers for installed hardware</strong>. This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse. <strong>2. Generic drivers for common hardware.</strong> This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don't have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn't mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with. What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won't copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It's not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn't try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc... It's assumed that if you install new hardware you're intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. <em></em> <em>"How many drivers are really required?" -<strong> A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.</strong></em> As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to "bloat" as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM's I'm sure you're intelligent enough to be able to remove this "bloat" by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies. Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable. I'm sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims. @hackitect


A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect.
In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories.

1. Drivers for installed hardware.

This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse.

2. Generic drivers for common hardware.

This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don’t have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn’t mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with.

What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won’t copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It’s not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn’t try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc… It’s assumed that if you install new hardware you’re intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. 
“How many drivers are really required?” - A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.

As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to “bloat” as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM’s I’m sure you’re intelligent enough to be able to remove this “bloat” by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies.

Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable.

I’m sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-6/#comment-71933 Omoronovo Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:00:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71933 <strong>@</strong><strong>hackitect</strong> <strong> </strong> A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect. In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories. <strong>1. Drivers for installed hardware</strong>. This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse. <strong>2. Generic drivers for common hardware.</strong> This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don't have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn't mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with. What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won't copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It's not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn't try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc... It's assumed that if you install new hardware you're intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. <em></em> <em>"How many drivers are really required?" -<strong> A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.</strong></em> As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to "bloat" as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM's I'm sure you're intelligent enough to be able to remove this "bloat" by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies. Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable. I'm sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims. @hackitect


A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect.
In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories.

1. Drivers for installed hardware.

This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse.

2. Generic drivers for common hardware.

This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don’t have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn’t mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with.

What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won’t copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It’s not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn’t try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc… It’s assumed that if you install new hardware you’re intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. 
“How many drivers are really required?” - A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.

As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to “bloat” as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM’s I’m sure you’re intelligent enough to be able to remove this “bloat” by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies.

Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable.

I’m sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-6/#comment-71934 Omoronovo Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:00:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71934 <strong>@</strong><strong>hackitect</strong> <strong> </strong> A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect. In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories. <strong>1. Drivers for installed hardware</strong>. This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse. <strong>2. Generic drivers for common hardware.</strong> This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don't have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn't mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with. What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won't copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It's not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn't try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc... It's assumed that if you install new hardware you're intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. <em></em> <em>"How many drivers are really required?" -<strong> A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.</strong></em> As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to "bloat" as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM's I'm sure you're intelligent enough to be able to remove this "bloat" by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies. Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable. I'm sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims. @hackitect


A few things about your post I find to eb a little bit incorrect.
In the case of your point about drivers, the bloat is left on the DVD. The drivers that are installed onto your computer when windows are installed come under two categories.

1. Drivers for installed hardware.

This is self explanitory, Windows copies all the drivers your system physically NEEDS to function. That is, the basic vga drivers (of which the windows 7 one supports aero, so they have at least tried to keep it updated), drive controllers, networking drivers, sound drivers, basic devices like keyboard/mouse.

2. Generic drivers for common hardware.

This subset of drivers include things like USB mass storage. Just because you don’t have a flash drive plugged in when you installed windows doesn’t mean you wont ever use one. Basic HID support is included here as well, in case you should ever add a gamepad or similar to play games with.

What you seem to fail to realise is that Windows uses a process of elimination as to what drivers it installs, or at least copies, to the system. If you have a realtek integrated sound chipset, it won’t copy the drivers for other integrated sound chipsets. It’s not like you an have two integrated ones right? If you use an Atheros wireless chipset, it doesn’t try to copy drivers for Ralink, Realtek, etc… It’s assumed that if you install new hardware you’re intelligent enough to find and install the best drivers yourself. 
“How many drivers are really required?” - A hell of a lot more than you appear to realise.

As for your comment relating to patches, you do realise what a patch is? It replaces files on the system with ones that are updated, often more secure or feature complete (hence the need for a patch). Patches do not contribute to “bloat” as you call it, because the only way old versions would be stored is if you keep Volume Shadow Copy enabled (system restore). If you work with VM’s I’m sure you’re intelligent enough to be able to remove this “bloat” by simply cleaning up your old restore points and clearing the shadow copies.

Unused features? Remove them by going to control panel > programs and features > turn windows features on or off. It really is that simple, and if you really want to remove something else, use the nlite/vlite version for windows 7 when it is released. There are REASONS not everything can be removed, usually to keep the OS stable.

I’m sorry if this seems to have become a rant post, but I really hate when people choose to make points that have no basis in truth, and/or have no evidence to back up their claims.

]]> By: hackitect http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-6/#comment-3100 hackitect Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:33:38 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3100 I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS. Aspects contributing to bload: 1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use) 2. Update patches 3. Unused features With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers. With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose. I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS.

Aspects contributing to bload:
1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use)
2. Update patches
3. Unused features

With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers.

With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose.

]]> By: hackitect http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71927 hackitect Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:33:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71927 I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS. Aspects contributing to bload: 1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use) 2. Update patches 3. Unused features With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers. With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose. I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS.

Aspects contributing to bload:
1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use)
2. Update patches
3. Unused features

With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers.

With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose.

]]> By: hackitect http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71928 hackitect Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:33:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71928 I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS. Aspects contributing to bload: 1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use) 2. Update patches 3. Unused features With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers. With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose. I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS.

Aspects contributing to bload:
1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use)
2. Update patches
3. Unused features

With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers.

With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose.

]]> By: hackitect http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71929 hackitect Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:33:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71929 I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS. Aspects contributing to bload: 1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use) 2. Update patches 3. Unused features With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers. With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose. I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS.

Aspects contributing to bload:
1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use)
2. Update patches
3. Unused features

With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers.

With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose.

]]> By: hackitect http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71930 hackitect Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:33:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71930 I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS. Aspects contributing to bload: 1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use) 2. Update patches 3. Unused features With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers. With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose. I dont mind slipping the DVD to add feature if I can keep the bloat down. Frequently use Virtual Machines. As XP is coming to end-of-life, I dont have a VM-Friendly OS.

Aspects contributing to bload:
1. Driver for every concivable hardware (except the one I use)
2. Update patches
3. Unused features

With in the context of a VM (Virtual PC or VMPlayer), how many drivers are really required? I would like an installation option which includes ONLY required drivers.

With in the context of a VM (personnel or enterprise) how many features matter? I would like an installation option which includes BITs for only options I choose.

]]> By: Even More Features Can Be Turned Off In Windows 7 | Windows 7 News http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-3074 Even More Features Can Be Turned Off In Windows 7 | Windows 7 News Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:11:18 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3074 [...] reported about the groundbreaking change in the Windows 7 release candidate that allowed users to uninstall Internet Explorer. While uninstallation was probably the wrong choice of words as it merely meant that the executable [...] [...] reported about the groundbreaking change in the Windows 7 release candidate that allowed users to uninstall Internet Explorer. While uninstallation was probably the wrong choice of words as it merely meant that the executable [...]

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-3069 smilingman Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:57:16 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3069 Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack. Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more. Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way. Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack.
Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more.
Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71923 smilingman Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:57:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71923 Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack. Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more. Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way. Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack.
Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more.
Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71924 smilingman Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:57:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71924 Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack. Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more. Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way. Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack.
Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more.
Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71925 smilingman Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:57:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71925 Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack. Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more. Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way. Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack.
Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more.
Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-5/#comment-71926 smilingman Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:57:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71926 Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack. Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more. Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way. Think more components of Win7 need to be uninstallable. This is why Windows has become bloated, unstable and easier to hack.
Win2k was the best version that MS every made till now, it was fast and had a small system foot print . Just what you need and nothing more.
Win7 maybe changing my mind if it keeps going this way.

]]> By: DanielRemains http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-3059 DanielRemains Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:10:34 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3059 For those saying it's fake.. NO IT'S NOT. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :) For those saying it’s fake.. NO IT’S NOT.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG

Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :)

]]> By: DanielRemains http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-71919 DanielRemains Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:10:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71919 For those saying it's fake.. NO IT'S NOT. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :) For those saying it’s fake.. NO IT’S NOT.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG

Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :)

]]> By: DanielRemains http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-71920 DanielRemains Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:10:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71920 For those saying it's fake.. NO IT'S NOT. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :) For those saying it’s fake.. NO IT’S NOT.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG

Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :)

]]> By: DanielRemains http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-71921 DanielRemains Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:10:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71921 For those saying it's fake.. NO IT'S NOT. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :) For those saying it’s fake.. NO IT’S NOT.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG

Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :)

]]> By: DanielRemains http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-71922 DanielRemains Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:10:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71922 For those saying it's fake.. NO IT'S NOT. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :) For those saying it’s fake.. NO IT’S NOT.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/657816/Pics/Windows7.PNG

Windows 7 BETA Build 7048 x64 :)

]]> By: Alan http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-4/#comment-3043 Alan Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:50:13 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-3043 In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC. In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-3/#comment-71915 Omoronovo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:50:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71915 In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC. In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-3/#comment-71916 Omoronovo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:50:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71916 In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC. In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC.

]]> By: Omoronovo http://www.windows7news.com/2009/03/04/internet-explorer-8-can-be-uninstalled-in-latest-windows-7-build/comment-page-3/#comment-71917 Omoronovo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:50:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=1024#comment-71917 In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC. In that case then, 7050 looks to be more and more likely. The PDC and Beta builds that were released to developers (Builds 6801, 7000) had been build around a month in advance so they could d extended testing on those specific builds. If they build one build a day, then build 7050 will have been created on 21/2, meaning microsoft will have approximately 6 weeks of full-scale testing before releasing the RC.

]]>