<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Beta Damages Some MP3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/</link>
	<description>Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Release Windows 7. Not. &#124; Codetaku</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-3/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Release Windows 7. Not. &#124; Codetaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>[...] nu este gata nici pe departe. Nu pe degeaba se numeste [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nu este gata nici pe departe. Nu pe degeaba se numeste [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 beta is available for download &#124; Tamir Khason - Just code</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-3/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 beta is available for download &#124; Tamir Khason - Just code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, if youâ€™re planning to install this build on your working machine, be sure, to install KB961367 in order to prevent corruption of MP3 files. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, if youâ€™re planning to install this build on your working machine, be sure, to install KB961367 in order to prevent corruption of MP3 files. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaustav</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-3/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaustav</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70901</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70901</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaustav</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70902</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70902</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 also corrupts jpg files. The same marker problems. I lost a few with the beta build (pre 7000)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tin</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.

On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tin</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70899</link>
		<dc:creator>Tin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70899</guid>
		<description>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.

On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tin</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70900</guid>
		<description>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.

On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ogg Vorbis: Better quality than MP3, not hindered by patents, and now also not chopped up by Windows for no apparent reason.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, this is actually very bad if I follow it correctly. Windows EXPLORER (not a media player) is taking it upon itself to re-write files it was not asked to touch. That is a very big no-no in my books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naruto</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>if this news is right may be I won&#039;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#039;t work without hearing MP3 music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this news is right may be I won&#8217;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#8217;t work without hearing MP3 music</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naruto</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70897</link>
		<dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70897</guid>
		<description>if this news is right may be I won&#039;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#039;t work without hearing MP3 music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this news is right may be I won&#8217;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#8217;t work without hearing MP3 music</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naruto</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-2/#comment-70898</link>
		<dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70898</guid>
		<description>if this news is right may be I won&#039;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#039;t work without hearing MP3 music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this news is right may be I won&#8217;t use this as my os until the full version come since I can&#8217;t work without hearing MP3 music</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman XG</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman XG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. 

MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.

If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.

Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. </p>
<p>MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.</p>
<p>Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman XG</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-70895</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman XG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70895</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. 

MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.

If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.

Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. </p>
<p>MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.</p>
<p>Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilingman XG</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-70896</link>
		<dc:creator>smilingman XG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70896</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. 

MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.

If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.

Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Alan B., that its bad for MS to report issue and have bug fixes for Win7 so early. This is why you release beta software to testers and developers, so that bugs are find before retail versions are shipped. </p>
<p>MS is now for shipping buggy and over hyped software, but the more per-release testing the better for end users.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, Vista had a very short and limited public testing period and we can see the results of that miss step.</p>
<p>Beside you use alpha, beta, per-release and release candidates at your own risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>If the bug wont be in the official beta, does that mean that the official beta might have a higher build number? Or does it simply mean that there will be a patch available as soon as the build is released? Or even, the download might be a patched iso instead?

I can&#039;t see how it would be good press for Microsoft to have an OS (even a beta one) requiring updates the second it&#039;s publicly available. And if it&#039;s an increased build number, that would seem to indicate that the &quot;beta 1 leak&quot; turned out to not be a leak at all thanks to last minute changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the bug wont be in the official beta, does that mean that the official beta might have a higher build number? Or does it simply mean that there will be a patch available as soon as the build is released? Or even, the download might be a patched iso instead?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see how it would be good press for Microsoft to have an OS (even a beta one) requiring updates the second it&#8217;s publicly available. And if it&#8217;s an increased build number, that would seem to indicate that the &#8220;beta 1 leak&#8221; turned out to not be a leak at all thanks to last minute changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omoronovo</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-70894</link>
		<dc:creator>Omoronovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70894</guid>
		<description>If the bug wont be in the official beta, does that mean that the official beta might have a higher build number? Or does it simply mean that there will be a patch available as soon as the build is released? Or even, the download might be a patched iso instead?

I can&#039;t see how it would be good press for Microsoft to have an OS (even a beta one) requiring updates the second it&#039;s publicly available. And if it&#039;s an increased build number, that would seem to indicate that the &quot;beta 1 leak&quot; turned out to not be a leak at all thanks to last minute changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the bug wont be in the official beta, does that mean that the official beta might have a higher build number? Or does it simply mean that there will be a patch available as soon as the build is released? Or even, the download might be a patched iso instead?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see how it would be good press for Microsoft to have an OS (even a beta one) requiring updates the second it&#8217;s publicly available. And if it&#8217;s an increased build number, that would seem to indicate that the &#8220;beta 1 leak&#8221; turned out to not be a leak at all thanks to last minute changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>Good find, that is what betas are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find, that is what betas are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-70893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70893</guid>
		<description>Good find, that is what betas are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find, that is what betas are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 News,Themes,Tips,Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 News,Themes,Tips,Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Windows 7 Beta Damages Some MP3...&lt;/strong&gt;

new windows 7It is probably fair to say that the Windows 7 builds that have been floating around on the Internet are very stable and that only a handful of minor errors have been reported yet. According to Neowin the latest two builds of Windows 7 that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Windows 7 Beta Damages Some MP3&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>new windows 7It is probably fair to say that the Windows 7 builds that have been floating around on the Internet are very stable and that only a handful of minor errors have been reported yet. According to Neowin the latest two builds of Windows 7 that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>mp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>that was one of the first things i noticed. the mp3 i tried to play, played fine in xp again though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was one of the first things i noticed. the mp3 i tried to play, played fine in xp again though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp</title>
		<link>http://www.windows7news.com/2009/01/02/windows-7-beta-damages-some-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-70892</link>
		<dc:creator>mp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7news.com/?p=785#comment-70892</guid>
		<description>that was one of the first things i noticed. the mp3 i tried to play, played fine in xp again though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was one of the first things i noticed. the mp3 i tried to play, played fine in xp again though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 15/34 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Object Caching 729/741 objects using apc

Served from: www.windows7news.com @ 2012-02-09 08:34:12 -->
