Comments on: Windows 7 Direct3D 10Level9 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/ Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers & Guides Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Diabetes http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-7/#comment-108598 Diabetes Mon, 30 May 2011 08:28:55 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-108598 <strong>Glucose Meter...</strong> [...]keeping diabetes in check begins with monitoring[...]... Glucose Meter…

[...]keeping diabetes in check begins with monitoring[...]…

]]> By: Dark Under Eye http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-7/#comment-106985 Dark Under Eye Thu, 19 May 2011 04:56:58 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-106985 <strong>Dark Under Eye Remedies...</strong> [...]are affordable and in many cases free[...]... Dark Under Eye Remedies…

[...]are affordable and in many cases free[...]…

]]> By: eBook Download for Free http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-7/#comment-106373 eBook Download for Free Wed, 18 May 2011 19:30:48 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-106373 <strong>iPhone eBook Reader...</strong> [...]your Apple iPhone can also display eBooks in various formats[...]... iPhone eBook Reader…

[...]your Apple iPhone can also display eBooks in various formats[...]…

]]> By: Glucose Monitor http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-7/#comment-105143 Glucose Monitor Thu, 12 May 2011 05:44:32 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-105143 <strong>Overview of Diabetes...</strong> [...]Diabetes is more common than most people think[...]... Overview of Diabetes…

[...]Diabetes is more common than most people think[...]…

]]> By: chieftain20 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-7/#comment-22568 chieftain20 Fri, 22 May 2009 18:30:42 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-22568 Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them. You don't know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920x1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps. Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them.

You don’t know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920×1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps.

]]> By: chieftain20 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-6/#comment-70447 chieftain20 Fri, 22 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70447 Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them. You don't know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920x1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps. Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them.

You don’t know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920×1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps.

]]> By: chieftain20 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-6/#comment-70448 chieftain20 Fri, 22 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70448 Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them. You don't know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920x1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps. Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them.

You don’t know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920×1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps.

]]> By: chieftain20 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-6/#comment-70449 chieftain20 Fri, 22 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70449 Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them. You don't know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920x1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps. Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them.

You don’t know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920×1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps.

]]> By: chieftain20 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-6/#comment-70450 chieftain20 Fri, 22 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70450 Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them. You don't know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920x1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps. Seriously, for you people running with onboard graphics: Buy a video card! I will NEVER use onboard EVER again. Ever since my first video card (x1650 pro agp) I have never gone back. With all my PC builds every one now has an equivalent of an 8800gt or better in them.

You don’t know what gaming is like until you experience it with an 280GTX at 1920×1200 with 40fps in Crysis on High settings. Or even Fallout 3 at max settings with 60+ fps.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-2902 smilingman Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:35:24 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-2902 I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too. If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox. I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works. You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made. I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too.
If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox.
I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works.
You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70443 smilingman Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:35:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70443 I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too. If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox. I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works. You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made. I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too.
If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox.
I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works.
You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70444 smilingman Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:35:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70444 I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too. If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox. I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works. You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made. I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too.
If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox.
I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works.
You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70445 smilingman Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:35:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70445 I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too. If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox. I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works. You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made. I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too.
If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox.
I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works.
You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made.

]]> By: smilingman http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70446 smilingman Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:35:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70446 I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too. If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox. I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works. You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made. I have tested BF2/2142, Guild Wars, HL2, Second Life, and even Myst Uru work. I have many more games to test but to be honest I see the PC at less of a gaming platform than I use too.
If your trying to run Win95 games them maybe you should us a virtual machine like  VirtualBox.
I have Mixman DM2 usb turntable and it is only for WinXP and Win2K, so I thought I would have to give it up. But I now run a strip down version of WinXP in VirtualBox and it works.
You may have to give up some older game if no patches are made.

]]> By: zammbi http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-6/#comment-2892 zammbi Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:56:45 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-2892 Windows 7 works fine for game. I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine. Windows 7 works fine for game.
I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine.

]]> By: Zammbi http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70439 Zammbi Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:56:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70439 Windows 7 works fine for game. I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine. Windows 7 works fine for game.
I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine.

]]> By: Zammbi http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70440 Zammbi Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:56:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70440 Windows 7 works fine for game. I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine. Windows 7 works fine for game.
I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine.

]]> By: Zammbi http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70441 Zammbi Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:56:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70441 Windows 7 works fine for game. I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine. Windows 7 works fine for game.
I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine.

]]> By: Zammbi http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70442 Zammbi Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:56:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70442 Windows 7 works fine for game. I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine. Windows 7 works fine for game.
I have intel inbuilt graphics and I can run COD4 and left 4 dead fine.

]]> By: Dinalth http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-2710 Dinalth Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:13:48 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-2710  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games... but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp... so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games… but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp… so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp

]]> By: Dinalth http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70435 Dinalth Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70435  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games... but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp... so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games… but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp… so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp

]]> By: Dinalth http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70436 Dinalth Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70436  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games... but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp... so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games… but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp… so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp

]]> By: Dinalth http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70437 Dinalth Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70437  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games... but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp... so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games… but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp… so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp

]]> By: Dinalth http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-70438 Dinalth Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70438  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games... but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp... so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp  Im just looking for a fix for win7 to run older games… but reading this i have to say really fast i have win 7 i have vista and i have xp… so which system is the best? by far and wide xp LOL vista dont support ddr3 ram 7 is glitchy atm about it and xp could care less about it. as for game compatability everything worked in xp vista was always sketchy about it and 7 seems to crap out on games atm. So im waiting for a fix for all this and probably stepping back to xp

]]> By: smilingman XG http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-5/#comment-1487 smilingman XG Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:23:30 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1487 I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day. As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista. This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration. Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that's good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous. I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day.

As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista.

This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration.

Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that’s good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous.

]]> By: smilingman XG http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-4/#comment-70431 smilingman XG Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:23:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70431 I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day. As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista. This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration. Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that's good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous. I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day.

As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista.

This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration.

Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that’s good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous.

]]> By: smilingman XG http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-4/#comment-70432 smilingman XG Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:23:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70432 I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day. As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista. This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration. Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that's good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous. I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day.

As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista.

This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration.

Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that’s good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous.

]]> By: smilingman XG http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-4/#comment-70433 smilingman XG Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:23:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70433 I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day. As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista. This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration. Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that's good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous. I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day.

As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista.

This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration.

Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that’s good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous.

]]> By: smilingman XG http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-4/#comment-70434 smilingman XG Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:23:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70434 I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day. As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista. This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration. Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that's good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous. I agree with Tom D to a point, that you need to upgrade at some time. If your a gamer your doing that all the time any way. But an OS should not be unusable for more than 80% of your user base on launch day.

As a lite gamer for MS to give no DX10 support to WinXP was a bad call, DX11 I can understand that move. Considering Vista bad RAM management it was just one more bad decision of many with Vista.

This 10level9 is just meaningless, you can get a DX10.1 APG Radeon 3650 for less than 100 US dollars and 2GB DDR RAM for 60 US dollars. Its time to start planning life after WinXP and start thinking about your next OEM computer or your new DIY hardware configuration.

Thankful everything I read on this site leaves me to believe that Win7 will fix what Vista broke. But if you are still run 6 year old hardware and think that’s good enough, you be wrong and to complain about it is ridiculous.

]]> By: Tom D http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-4/#comment-1479 Tom D Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:03:23 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1479 oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period. If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn't last forever... technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista! oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period.

If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn’t last forever… technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista!

]]> By: Tom D http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-70427 Tom D Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:03:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70427 oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period. If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn't last forever... technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista! oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period.

If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn’t last forever… technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista!

]]> By: Tom D http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-70428 Tom D Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:03:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70428 oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period. If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn't last forever... technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista! oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period.

If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn’t last forever… technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista!

]]> By: Tom D http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-70429 Tom D Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:03:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70429 oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period. If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn't last forever... technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista! oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period.

If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn’t last forever… technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista!

]]> By: Tom D http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-70430 Tom D Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:03:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70430 oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period. If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn't last forever... technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista! oh my goodness, quit whining! just upgrade your old computers if you want the best gaming experience. Vista + a DX10 graphics card makes (i have the nvidia 8500 GT 512mb DDR2) the best gaming machines, period.

If you know anything about technology, you should know that XP wouldn’t last forever… technology drastically changes year by year, and XP is over 6 frickin years old now! Go Vista!

]]> By: Silma http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-1471 Silma Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:39:32 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1471 My god, this is even worse than restricting DX10 to Vista. That way newb l(users) really will go "ZOMG XP IS LIEK SOOOO SLOW LET'S WINDOWS 7" over and over again. My god, this is even worse than restricting DX10 to Vista. That way newb l(users) really will go “ZOMG XP IS LIEK SOOOO SLOW LET’S WINDOWS 7″ over and over again.

]]> By: Silma http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-70426 Silma Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:39:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70426 My god, this is even worse than restricting DX10 to Vista. That way newb l(users) really will go "ZOMG XP IS LIEK SOOOO SLOW LET'S WINDOWS 7" over and over again. My god, this is even worse than restricting DX10 to Vista. That way newb l(users) really will go “ZOMG XP IS LIEK SOOOO SLOW LET’S WINDOWS 7″ over and over again.

]]> By: Firehawk2012 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-3/#comment-1470 Firehawk2012 Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:54:12 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1470 tim , i think you read wrong , it said" Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10" so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9 tim , i think you read wrong , it said” Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10″ so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9

]]> By: Firehawk2012 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70423 Firehawk2012 Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:54:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70423 tim , i think you read wrong , it said" Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10" so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9 tim , i think you read wrong , it said” Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10″ so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9

]]> By: Firehawk2012 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70424 Firehawk2012 Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:54:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70424 tim , i think you read wrong , it said" Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10" so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9 tim , i think you read wrong , it said” Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10″ so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9

]]> By: Firehawk2012 http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70425 Firehawk2012 Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:54:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70425 tim , i think you read wrong , it said" Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10" so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9 tim , i think you read wrong , it said” Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform (WARP) will kick in if the video card is not supporting Direct3D 9 or Direct3D 10″ so its saying that if you install this dx version and your card doesnt support dx hardware requirments that it  will use software emulation,so to sum that up you will be fine if you own dx 10 hardware,and if you dont then just stick with dx 9

]]> By: Tim http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-1466 Tim Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:20:17 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1466 Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7. Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That'll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7. Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7.

Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That’ll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7.

]]> By: Tim http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70419 Tim Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:20:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70419 Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7. Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That'll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7. Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7.

Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That’ll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7.

]]> By: Tim http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70420 Tim Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:20:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70420 Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7. Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That'll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7. Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7.

Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That’ll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7.

]]> By: Tim http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70421 Tim Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:20:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70421 Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7. Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That'll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7. Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7.

Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That’ll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7.

]]> By: Tim http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-70422 Tim Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:20:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70422 Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7. Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That'll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7. Point is marketing.  DirectX 11 for Windows XP, Vista and 7.

Instead of dropping XP support, lets make it run like shit instead.  No HAL support, only software emulation for XP even if its got hardware capable of operating by HAL.  That’ll get them saying XP is so slooow compared to  7.

]]> By: :) http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-2/#comment-1462 :) Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:13:23 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-1462 At the end of my pencil :) At the end of my pencil :)

]]> By: :) http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-1/#comment-70414 :) Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70414 At the end of my pencil :) At the end of my pencil :)

]]> By: :) http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-1/#comment-70415 :) Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70415 At the end of my pencil :) At the end of my pencil :)

]]> By: :) http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-1/#comment-70416 :) Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70416 At the end of my pencil :) At the end of my pencil :)

]]> By: :) http://www.windows7news.com/2008/11/26/windows-7-direct3d-10level9/comment-page-1/#comment-70417 :) Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=706#comment-70417 At the end of my pencil :) At the end of my pencil :)

]]>