Comments on: First Security Patch For Windows 7 Pre-Beta http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/ Latest Microsoft Windows 7 News, Tips, Themes, Wallpapers & Guides Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: PROSENJIT http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-2/#comment-2904 PROSENJIT Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:02:06 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-2904 VARY GOOD VARY GOOD

]]> By: PROSENJIT http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69849 PROSENJIT Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:02:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69849 VARY GOOD VARY GOOD

]]> By: PROSENJIT http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69850 PROSENJIT Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:02:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69850 VARY GOOD VARY GOOD

]]> By: PROSENJIT http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69851 PROSENJIT Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:02:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69851 VARY GOOD VARY GOOD

]]> By: someone http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1601 someone Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:31:01 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-1601 <strong>"</strong>The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008<strong>"</strong> <strong>"</strong>The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system<strong>"</strong> So, it affects <strong>Vista</strong> and it also affects <strong>Windows 7</strong>.  This could mean that either 1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas, <strong>OR</strong> 2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7. Seems like some sort of shady plot to me...paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade <strong>Windows Vista</strong> to <strong>Windows Vista</strong> (<strong>7</strong>) “The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008“
“The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system“

So, it affects Vista and it also affects Windows 7.  This could mean that either
1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas,
OR
2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7.

Seems like some sort of shady plot to me…paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows Vista (7)

]]> By: someone http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69846 someone Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:31:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69846 <strong>"</strong>The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008<strong>"</strong> <strong>"</strong>The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system<strong>"</strong> So, it affects <strong>Vista</strong> and it also affects <strong>Windows 7</strong>.  This could mean that either 1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas, <strong>OR</strong> 2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7. Seems like some sort of shady plot to me...paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade <strong>Windows Vista</strong> to <strong>Windows Vista</strong> (<strong>7</strong>) “The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008“
“The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system“

So, it affects Vista and it also affects Windows 7.  This could mean that either
1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas,
OR
2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7.

Seems like some sort of shady plot to me…paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows Vista (7)

]]> By: someone http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69847 someone Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:31:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69847 <strong>"</strong>The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008<strong>"</strong> <strong>"</strong>The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system<strong>"</strong> So, it affects <strong>Vista</strong> and it also affects <strong>Windows 7</strong>.  This could mean that either 1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas, <strong>OR</strong> 2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7. Seems like some sort of shady plot to me...paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade <strong>Windows Vista</strong> to <strong>Windows Vista</strong> (<strong>7</strong>) “The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008“
“The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system“

So, it affects Vista and it also affects Windows 7.  This could mean that either
1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas,
OR
2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7.

Seems like some sort of shady plot to me…paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows Vista (7)

]]> By: someone http://www.windows7news.com/2008/10/23/first-security-patch-for-windows-7-pre-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-69848 someone Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:31:00 +0000 http://windows7news.com/?p=417#comment-69848 <strong>"</strong>The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008<strong>"</strong> <strong>"</strong>The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system<strong>"</strong> So, it affects <strong>Vista</strong> and it also affects <strong>Windows 7</strong>.  This could mean that either 1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas, <strong>OR</strong> 2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7. Seems like some sort of shady plot to me...paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade <strong>Windows Vista</strong> to <strong>Windows Vista</strong> (<strong>7</strong>) “The vulnerability was rated critical on Windows XP, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 and important on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008“
“The interesting part related to Windows 7 is the fact that this vulnerability is also affecting the upcoming Windows 7 operating system“

So, it affects Vista and it also affects Windows 7.  This could mean that either
1-Microsoft puts nobody on a team to look for these things in their pre-betas,
OR
2-Microsoft is releasing Vista with just some new little knick-knacks, and an even uglier user interface, yet changing the name to Windows 7.

Seems like some sort of shady plot to me…paying an additional $500 bucks to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows Vista (7)

]]>